Bitcoin Bottom Is In, Says Mow — Charts Warn of $40K
Samson Mow just called the bottom on X. The analysts staring at moving averages have a very different number in mind — and your stack is caught in the middle.
Founder & Lead Technician

Quick answer
Samson Mow says bitcoin has bottomed, arguing the four-year halving cycle accelerated after the 2024 all-time high landed 37 days early. Analysts disagree, with forecasts for a true low ranging from current levels down to $40,000-$55,000 later in 2026.
Samson Mow just told the market to stop waiting. The bottom, he says, is already behind us.
In an X post on Sunday, the high-profile bitcoin advocate declared flatly: the bottom is in. Not coming. In. And he is saying it while bitcoin sits below $60,000, on track for a rare back-to-back quarterly loss.
Here is the problem. Almost nobody with a chart open agrees with him.
What Mow actually argued
Mow built his call on one specific detail most people glossed over: timing. Bitcoin hit a then-record high 37 days before the April 2024 halving.
That, he says, breaks the script.
For years, the four-year halving cycle has been treated as gospel — price tops roughly a year after each halving, bottoms arrive on schedule, rinse and repeat. Mow is calling that obsolete.
I find it incredibly interesting how some people are so certain that the bottom is coming in four months because of cycles, Mow wrote. But we had an ATH 37 days before the halving, so even if you believe in cycles, you should reason out that the cycles accelerated. The bottom is in.
His logic is internally consistent: if the top came early, the bottom did too. And Mow is not a random account. He is the former chief strategy officer at Adam Back's Blockstream, known for his $1 million bitcoin prediction and his work pushing nation-state adoption, including El Salvador's bitcoin program.
So when he plants a flag, people look. But conviction is not a price floor — and that is where this gets uncomfortable.
The analysts looking at the same chart see something worse
Mow is not even the first to argue the cycle changed. After bitcoin ran to a record before the 2024 halving, several analysts floated the idea that spot bitcoin ETF demand from big institutions had rewired the old pattern. Others said it was far too soon to call.
That debate never got settled. And the people who model bottoms for a living are now split into two camps that barely overlap.
Here is how the field actually lines up right now:
| Voice | The call | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|
| Samson Mow | Bottom is already in | Halving cycle accelerated (ATH came 37 days early) |
| Omkar Godbole, CoinDesk | Limited downside left | 50-week and 100-week moving average bear cross |
| Markus Thielen, 10x Research | Around $55,000, Aug to Oct | Timing and price modeling |
| James Van Straten, CoinDesk | 15% or more lower | 200-week moving average, realized price |
| Arthur Hayes, BitMEX co-founder | Around $40,000 within 6 months | Macro and liquidity view |
Notice the spread. From we already bottomed to we still have $20,000 to give back. That is not a rounding error. That is the entire difference between buying today and getting cut in half.
So who has the better argument?
Let me be direct: the bearish case is built on more machinery, and that matters.
CoinDesk's Omkar Godbole actually leans bullish using a contrarian signal — bitcoin's 50-week average is about to cross below its 100-week average, a bear cross that has historically lined up with market bottoms, not tops. It sounds scary, prints green later. That partially supports Mow.
But the heavier hitters point the other way. Markus Thielen of 10x Research pegs the likely bottom near $55,000, and not until somewhere between August and October — months away, lower than now. Arthur Hayes is blunter, calling for roughly $40,000 within six months.
Then there is the indicator that should worry holders most. CoinDesk senior analyst James Van Straten notes bitcoin is testing its 200-week moving average, and on-chain data flags the $50,000 to $54,000 zone as the next battleground.
His sharpest point is historical. In every major bear market since 2011, bitcoin eventually traded below its realized price before carving out a real cycle bottom. This time, it has not done that yet.
That is the uncomfortable gap in Mow's call. A clean bottom usually leaves a specific footprint in the data. So far, that footprint is missing.
What this means for your stack
You do not have to pick a guru. You have to manage risk while smart people openly disagree. Here is how to think about it without getting wrecked by either side.
- Treat single-person bottom calls as opinions, not signals. Mow may be right. He is also famous for a $1 million target that has not landed. Conviction is not data.
- Watch the realized price test. Van Straten's point is the most checkable one here: historically, bitcoin dips under realized price before a durable low. If that has not happened, the cleanest bottom signal has not fired.
- Mark the $50,000 to $54,000 zone. Multiple independent analysts keep landing near it. When unrelated models converge on one band, that band matters.
- Do not deploy your whole position on a tweet. If you believe Mow, scaling in beats going all-in. If he is wrong, you still have ammunition at $40,000.
- Separate timeframe from price. Thielen's call is not just a number, it is a clock — August to October. A bottom that is real but four months away is still four months of pain if you are overexposed now.
What happens next (24 to 72 hours)
Expect the disagreement to get louder, not quieter. With bitcoin under $60,000 and staring down a back-to-back quarterly loss, every move toward $54,000 will be read as either confirmation that the lower targets are coming or a successful retest that proves Mow right.
Watch two things specifically: whether price holds above that $50,000 to $54,000 band, and whether on-chain realized price finally gets breached. The first tells you if the bulls are defending. The second tells you if the textbook bottom signal is even on the table yet.
Mow says it is over. The charts say not so fast. Until bitcoin either reclaims momentum or prints that missing realized-price flush, this is not a settled call — it is a live one, and your sizing should reflect that.
Source: CoinDesk
Frequently asked questions
Did Samson Mow say the bitcoin bottom is in?+
Yes. In an X post on Sunday, Mow said the bitcoin bottom is in, arguing the traditional four-year halving cycle has accelerated because the 2024 all-time high arrived 37 days before the April halving.
What price do analysts think bitcoin will bottom at?+
Forecasts vary widely. Markus Thielen of 10x Research sees roughly $55,000 between August and October, Arthur Hayes expects around $40,000 within six months, and James Van Straten says bitcoin may still drop 15% or more toward its 200-week moving average.
Why does the halving cycle matter for the bitcoin bottom call?+
The four-year halving cycle has historically framed bitcoin tops and bottoms. Mow argues that because the last all-time high came 37 days before the halving, the cycle sped up, making old cycle-based bottom predictions less reliable.
Founder & Lead Technician
Daniel founded Ask Technicians to cut through bad tech advice. He writes hands-on troubleshooting guides drawn from years of real-world repair and support work.
Related guides

Saylor Is Down Billions on Bitcoin - and Wants to Buy More
Strategy paid an average of 75,653 dollars per coin. Bitcoin just fell under 60,000. So why is Saylor teasing another buy?

Dogecoin Dropped 10% While AI Stocks Stole the Money
Wall Street hit fresh records this week. Crypto saw none of it — and the reason it got left behind should worry leveraged traders.

Bitcoin Fell Below $60K and Broke a Decade-Long Pattern
Bitcoin slipped under $60K and is closing a losing first half that has happened only twice in its history. Here is what is dragging it down — and what is next.

CZ Blames Crypto's 2026 Slump on AI, Tension, Cycle
Binance founder CZ says no single cause explains crypto's roughly 50% slide over the past year, pointing to AI, geopolitics and the four-year cycle.
